Socionics Personals | | Female Straight 16-25 Oceania Libra ENFj |
| | Male Straight 16-25 Middle East Sagittarius INTj |
| | Male Straight 26-35 North America Pisces INXj |
| Join now! |
Who is who?Learn how to convert between different systems
V.I.An introduction into the widely used Socionics Visual Identification technique
TestsA collection of Socionics related tests and quizes
Q & AsAsk a Socionics related question or provide an answer to an existing one
ArticlesVarious articles on the subject of Socionics and Types in general
ForumsWant to discuss Type? Head to Socionics Forums!
|
Type distribution statistics (Dec 1999 - 29 Aug 2001)
Data type: keywords returned from various search engines
Period covered: Dec 1999 - 29 Aug 2001
Data source: log.keys2.html processed on 29 Aug 2001
Population covered:
1. People who have access to the Internet
2. People who are interested in Socionics
3. People who can speak English
Keywords taken into consideration: entp, isfp, esfj....etc, which have been used alone or as a first word of the search string
Total related enquiries: 11812
Results as follow:
Distribution by "Type"
Type |
Enquiries |
Percentage |
Graph |
ENTp |
711 |
6.02% |
|||||||||||| |
ISFp |
586 |
4.96% |
|||||||||| |
ESFj |
488 |
4.13% |
|||||||| |
INTj |
1060 |
8.97% |
|||||||||||||||||| |
ENFj |
672 |
5.69% |
||||||||||| |
ISTj |
841 |
7.12% |
|||||||||||||| |
ESTp |
340 |
2.88% |
|||||| |
INFp |
1630 |
13.80% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
ESFp |
384 |
3.25% |
||||||| |
INTp |
1010 |
8.55% |
||||||||||||||||| |
ENTj |
626 |
5.30% |
||||||||||| |
ISFj |
593 |
5.02% |
|||||||||| |
ESTj |
447 |
3.78% |
||||||| |
INFj |
1432 |
12.12% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||| |
ENFp |
747 |
6.32% |
||||||||||||| |
ISTp |
245 |
2.07% |
|||| |
Most and least common types
|
Most common |
Least common |
1. |
INFp |
ISTp |
2. |
INFj |
ESTp |
3. |
INTj |
ESFp |
Distribution by "Individual Preference"
Preference |
Enquiries |
Percentage |
Graph |
E |
4415 |
37.38% |
|||||||||||||||||| |
I |
7397 |
62.62% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
S |
3924 |
33.22% |
|||||||||||||||| |
N |
7888 |
66.78% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
T |
5280 |
44.70% |
|||||||||||||||||||||| |
F |
6532 |
55.30% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
j |
6159 |
52.14% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
p |
5653 |
47.86% |
||||||||||||||||||||||| |
Most and least common individual preferences
Most common |
Least common |
I, N, F and j |
E, S, T and p |
Important note about
this result: Looking at the sum of individual
preferences in the table just above, it appears that the
most common type is INFj and that the least common is
ESTp. However, it's been already established in the Distribution
by "Type" results that it is actually
INFp which is most common, and ISTp is the least common
type. This little example shows that trying to identify
the whole type by identifying the individual preferences
does not in any way mean that you would find the whole
type. Every psychometric tool working on individual
preferences principle will have poor reliability because
of this fact.
Distribution by "Club"
Club |
Enquiries |
Percentage |
Graph |
NT |
3407 |
28.84% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
ST |
1873 |
15.86% |
|||||||||||||||| |
NF |
4481 |
37.94% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
SF |
2051 |
17.36% |
||||||||||||||||| |
Distribution by "Quadrable"
Quadrable |
Enquiries |
Percentage |
Graph |
Alpha |
2845 |
24.08% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||| |
Beta |
3483 |
29.49% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
Gamma |
2613 |
22.12% |
|||||||||||||||||||||| |
Delta |
2871 |
24.31% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||| |
|
|